How a saving gets measured.
Every percentage on this site is the difference between two measurements taken with the same instruments on the same circuits. This page is the method, the instrument, and the public data behind the problem.
The measurement method
Four steps · in orderThe instrument
A claim is only as good as the thing that produced it. These are checkable against the standard rather than against us.
The problem, in public numbers
NEPRA · FY2024-25These are not our figures. They come from the regulator’s own annual report, and they are the reason the work exists.
What we can and cannot do today
Stated plainly, because a procurement team will find this out anyway and it is better said here.
On case studies
We have not published one. A case study here carries five things every time — context, measured baseline, what was deployed, the result, and how it was verified — and no deployment has yet supplied all five.
Nor are there quotes anywhere on this site. A quote carries a named person and a title, or it is cut. An anonymised endorsement is not evidence.
If you want to see the method applied to a building rather than described, a site assessment produces exactly that — for your own facility, with your own numbers.
Book a site assessment
Two engineers, one day on site, a written report with measured baseline and modelled payback.
